Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Friday, September 7, 2012

Zook the Hero Z: The Complete Instruction Book.

I have been receiving numerous comment, countless phone call, not to mention voluminous card and letter. Bowing to the pressure, I shall forestall talking more about Madoka and Rosavam and instead present the entire Zook Z instruction booklet.

Sans snarky remarks by me or even long drawn out stories on how much trouble it was to scan these images.

Just so you know, I have no problem what so ever with people saving the Zook the Hero Z instruction manual scans to their hard drive. You may even go a head and upload them to the net community of your choice without any credit given. You don't even need to link back to Ravy Online, or Ravy Comics. However any link is appreciated especially to here or here.

By the way, click on each image and it will take you to a page that has a full size version.
































Friday, August 24, 2012

Puella Magi Madoka Magica Volumes 1 and 2.

You've probably gotten those Nigerian Prince emails, right? Now it's Libyan General pleas for help. I got an email the other day from someone that was a general's daughter. You can pretty much guess the rest. Her daddy was killed and she managed to escape with much of "his money." Now she is stuck in some other African country. Her accounts have been frozen and she needs a loan to finish her escape. All she needs is your credit card number or better yet you bank account routing number.

The sad part is that these scams do work on enough people so that they keep doing it.

Admittedly I really only read the first few lines of that email. I mean, come on, you're asking a guy that does a webcomic and reviews manga, for money? (Now THAT'S a segue.)


         

Looking at it on the shelf you would think to yourself that this is just another magical girl snooze fest. I decided to pick it up and give it a try. You just don't know unless you give it a chance. A lot of the stuff you would expect is indeed in there. Younger teen lead character with overly bubbly personality: Check. Totally impractical silly costumes: check. Weird hair styles: check. Cute animal sidekick that has a bad habit of not telling you what you need to know: check. Guns: check.

GUNS!?

Hand grenades? Blood? Head splatters? Trying to kill each other? Holy cow! This is done by people that are sick and tired of She-Ra, Sailor Moon, and Pretty Sammy. Parents watch out. This is NOT for little girls. Yeah you get the “Does this ribbon make me look pretty?” conversations. That is quickly dispensed with in favor of scenes of possessed people attempting mass suicide. You wouldn't guess that looking at the covers. It looks like some kind of super heroine team. Anything but. Homura spends most of her time fighting everybody. Mami dies. Sayaka gets a little bloodthirsty. Madoka has yet to transform by the end of volume two.

I think I got a winner here. Now I admit I'm bothered by the fact that the main characters are in their younger teens, but, this is a magic girl manga after all. Graphically it swings between the simplistic: characters on a white background, to hard to follow complex action. The writing is good for the most part with some leaps in logic that leave you scratching your head. Of course if it was all logical then it wouldn't be mahou shoujo. I really like the character development. Each one has some kind of back story that is tragic and can even twist a character into something quite unexpected.

In my research for this article I was totally unable to find any scans of it what so ever. The site I got the images for Rosario Vampire did not have Madoka. Yen Press didn't have it in it's app store. So no extra images to comment on. I did find a few episodes of the anime on one of the manga sites I go to. This series is trippy. The one thing I didn't like was packing in too much detail. Glass walled classrooms? Those hallways, jeeze they're huge. Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you have to. All that detail overpowers the characters on screen and make it even more difficult to read the subtitles. Fortunately the DVDs I ordered are in English. What I liked the most was how the character animation looked almost like color manga. It was awesome.

The battles in the witches' wards piqued my interest. It seemed very much like British animation I watched a very long time ago. Maybe some inspiration from Ralph Bakshi. With a twisted twist of Terry Gilliam.

Can't wait for volume three. When's that out? December? Aw man.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Hard Drive Capacities by OS.

I bought my first computer way back in, well, it was quite awhile ago now. I'll just say it was the period of time I got tot watch anime such as Samurai X, Power Stone, Dual, and Ghostsweepers before they came out here in the States, in English, and mostly uncut. Even then I was not new to computers. My family has had one of some kind since as long as I can remember. A VIC-20 and then a Commodore 64. Admittedly I only used them for video games. It was my mom that actually used them as PCs. She was practically running the local library with a C64.

Fast forward a few years, (and minus a lot of stories because I think they're irrelevant) I decided it was time for me to buy my first PC. It was a Compaq Pressario with 475 MHz (that's mega) CPU. 32 MB (that's mega) of ram. Finally an eight GB hard drive ( that's eight, as it 8, not eighty, not 800, 8.) Even then at that time I noted something was hinky. Windows wasn't reporting the total usable space as 8GB. I asked the computer nerds at the time what was up. They all told me that the missing space was being used by Windows and other programs. I believed it for awhile. Then as I bought bigger and bigger hard drives, the amount of space Windows used stayed the same, but the amount of usable space went down even more.

How could this be?

I would learn that it was the way Windows reported usable hard drive capacity as opposed to the way hard drive manufacturers reported capacity. Manufacturers used the a base of 1000. Microsoft used 1024. This was a burning issue some ten years ago. At least every few months in the computer mags I read there would be a letter from a reader asking about that. In those days of 4, 8, 10, 20 GB hard drives, that was a big deal. I think the controversy has died in this age of terabytes. As long as we can can fit all of our music and movies onto one. If that should fill up, just get another terabyte drive that is cheaper than a forty GB was ten years ago.

The one thing I never saw anywhere was an actual study done as to the comparison of drive space lost to actual manufacturer specs. So I decided I was bored enough to do that study. On top of that I also decide to see which operating system did the best job of using hard drive space.

First the OSes: Windows 7 Home 64 SP1, because it is the most common one you will find.
Mac Snow Leopard Extended (Journeled) because I have a disk of it.
Then Ubuntu Linux 64 12.04 64 ext4 because I'm most familiar with it.

Next I needed some hard drives. A 500, 1000, and 2000 GB. Arbitrarily decided. Two test systems. Why two instead of one? The Intel system requires that I burn the Linux distro onto a CD. The AMD one I can use a thumb drive. The test systems:

For Windows and Linux:
Compaq Pressario:
CPU : AMD 64 Dual Core 3600 2GHz
Ram: 4GB DDR2

For Mac:
CPU: Intel P4 3 GHz
Ram: 2GB DDR

Installing each OS was interesting. Linux took the least amount of time at about 15 or so minutes. Windows was up around a half and hour. Mac took the longest. First I hard to use a boot disk based on a Linux distro and then swap out for the Mac disk. Then Mac took so long to load up I was able to play a good chunk of an old SNES game and paste together a couple of dozen comics for next year. I also noted that a couple of options in the Mac setup were identical to ones used in Linux. Specifically the pick your time zone map. I guess possibly because both were originally derivatives of Unix.

Mac had an interesting quirk: after installing on the 500GB drive it would boot up just fine. However on the 1TB and 2TB drives I had to use the boot disk. I guess possibly because I not familiar enough with the Mac setup options and clicked something that caused this.

Back to the main point:

The interesting thing I noted was that each OS fairly accurately reported the total capacity of each hard drive. However total usable space was quite different.

Linux was the worse of them all. The only consistent number I could get was that the bigger the hard drive, the more space the file system used. I tried three different methods and each one gave me wildly different sets of numbers. The most I can say is that Linux used up the most space.(I did try Linux Mint, the now most popular distro, same messed up results.)

Windows was middle of the road. On each hard drive it used 14GB of space. The usable capacities looked like this:

Labeled by manufacturer capacity:
500GB    1000GB    2000GB
Total usable by Windows:
451GB      917GB    1800GB
Total lost:
 49GB        83GB      200GB

Your mileage will vary. Keep in mind, store bought systems usually have hidden partitions for OS reboot. My test involved a wiped hard drive with only the partitions made by the OS. As we can see the bigger the hard drive, the more space is lost. Looks to be about 10GB per 100GB. Seeing as how a 2TB drive effectively costs less than a 200GB drive; no big deal nowadays.

Now for Mac. Mind you, I don't care for Mac. One reason is that I have to click twice to eject a disk instead of just pushing the damn button on the optical. However, might I say, it was the best in hard drives. Let's see shall we?

Total usable by Mac:
493GB     993GB    1993GB

Is this real? Can some Mac addict set me straight on these numbers? Really? (say it like The Miz now:) Really?

There was a little inconsistency on Apple's part. It was the total amount of space used by the OS:
5.92GB     6.2GB      6.1GB

There it is, my little contribution to a long dead conversation.

Friday, July 27, 2012

Video I'm trying to get makes for an unusual fix.


As you all know, one of the things I have bitched about a lot over the past years are those morons that do 40-45 MPH in the 55 MPH. Especially on this one section of road where you can't pass them. Hey, you're not the only one paying for this road, how about showing the rest of us some respect? You pass by at least two or three signs that clearly state 55 MPH. Still Tweedle-Dumber can't figure it out. Then we come to an intersection in which the road splits from two lanes to four. Right there is when it must dawn on the guy that wonders where the sun goes when it sets what the speed limit is.

Actually I think that most of these a-holes are doing it on purpose. They must have this attitude that no one will be allowed in front of them at all. A number of times when I went to change lanes to pass them, they magically match my cruise control settings. Thereby blocking me. On top of that often they shoot up to 70 MPH! No Kidding! I tried keeping up with them, but when my speedometer reaches 60, common sense on my part kicks in and I slow it down. Knowing my luck there is a cop up ahead and I'll be the one nailed.

My driver's license is my lively-hood. I'm not risking it on some dumbass trying to prove how big his dick is. I already pay through the nose for the best insurance I can get, I'm not paying any more for it because it doesn't cover MY stupidity.

I don't know what it is about this particular section of road. For some reason people act like they're the last lap of the Daytona 500. In both directions. Then they slow right back down at these two intersections. Never fails. Idiot does 45 MPH for several miles, at intersection one speeds up to 70, at intersection two slows it back down to 45. That's the other reason why I think they're doing it on purpose.

Now, what I have been trying to do for the past eight or so months is capture footage of this. I have had zero luck so far. It's amazing. As soon as that camera comes out, BOOM! Up to 55. Never fails. This is my theory: everybody has figured out that those traffic cameras right next to the stop lights are not on. If they were, nobody would be running the red lights. However, when looking in your rear view mirror, and a guy has a camera pointed at you, you know you're going to be on YouTube within hours.